Loading...
The orthodox, historical consensus of biblical interpretation.
Key question: “What is the most widely accepted and historically grounded understanding of this text?”
25,889 sermon illustrations through the Traditional lens
First, God's kindness (*chesed*) embodies tenderness toward the God-fearing.
First, Christ in us is the foundation of our hope, elected before the creation of the world (Ephesians 1:3–4; 1 Timothy 1:9).
For six days, Israel performed what appeared utterly useless—a silent, circular procession around an impregnable fortress.
He means it with deliberate, reiterated assurance to that handful of poor, ignorant fishermen who knew Him so dimly.
The prohibition is not against reasonable foresight, but against anxious foreboding, that wretched state in which a man is 'rent asunder' by care.
The work of Christ in us and for us does not exempt us from work.
The exiles' return to Jerusalem embodies this metaphor.
The apostle Paul, when dissuading from impurity, eschewed mere physical or social arguments.
His words, 'Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world!' are prophecy's swan-song, its final *Eureka!* uttered as it dies.
Christ does not merely teach about divine love—He claims to *be* its Object and its Channel.
Christ did not encourage this impetuous declaration but instead checked it—exposing the man's resolution as that of an unreflecting emotionalist and ambitious worldling.
He depicts "them that sit in darkness and the shadow of death"—not wanderers moving frantically, but travelers *benighted*, huddled together, afraid to move.
His counsel to leave the apostles unmolested was not born from sympathy with Christian truth, but from a shrewd political calculus: the Pharisees and Sadducees were locked in bitter theological combat over the resurrection, and these Galileans preaching *anastasis* (resurrection)...
Neither Ezra nor Nehemiah originated this gathering—they obeyed "a popular impulse which they had not created." This is extraordinary because Ezra, who had labored thirteen years in Jerusalem fighting corruptions among the returned captives, had never before promulgated the law...
Because all members share identical stakes in eternity.
For thirty years, under the guardianship of the High Priest Jehoiada, the king remained faithful to his conscience and duty.
Consider the comparison: A thief who forcibly enters a strong man's house, binds him, and seizes his weapons must possess greater strength than the householder.
He names it twice in his opening movement (verses 1 and 4), and again when addressing the Corinthians themselves (verses 6-7).
Many people attribute their deliverance to fortune or their own skill, yielding only scattered praise to God.
Maclaren observes that the repetition is not accidental.
Throughout this epistle, Paul has wielded the rod of remonstrance, irony, and indignation.
The abuses of the tongue are manifold, and malignity ranks foremost among them.
Yet Maclaren observes that "as they abode together and worked at their trade, there would be many earnest talks about the Christ, and these ended in both husband and wife becoming disciples." The mundane labor of their craft became the...
Yet this appeal reveals something profound: the preacher refers always back to Christ as the source of all authority and influence.